Proposify is proposal software with a strong design layer, baked-in e-signature and proposal-level analytics. We picked it because for agencies, consultancies and B2B teams whose proposals are part of the pitch, the visual quality and section tracking translates directly into win rates, in a way pure e-signature tools cannot.
How it works
You build a proposal from a content library of pre-designed sections (cover, about us, scope, pricing, terms, signature), drag in custom blocks, plug in data from your CRM, and send. Recipients view a hosted, branded proposal that tracks time per section, can include optional add-ons or pricing toggles, and ends with an in-line e-signature plus a tamper-evident audit log. The signed PDF gets stored against the deal in your CRM.
E-signatures are legally binding under ESIGN, UETA and eIDAS at the SES tier, suitable for the typical agency and B2B contract. Native CRM integrations cover Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, with Zapier and a REST API for the rest. Reporting includes win rate, average close time and content-block performance, which is genuinely useful for any team running a proposal-heavy sales motion.
Pricing reality
Proposify dropped its old Tall and Grande tiers and consolidated to a Team plan starting around $49/user/month with a 3-user minimum (so $147/month minimum), and a custom-priced Business tier for SSO, advanced workflows, custom roles and dedicated success. There is no solo or e-sig-only plan, which is the key pricing trade-off. The honest cost line: budget around $1,800/year minimum even for a small team.
Versus alternatives
Tool
Strength
Weakness vs Proposify
Proposify
Best-looking proposals + analytics
—
PandaDoc
Proposals + contracts + payments
Less polished design, more functional than premium
Better Proposals
Cheaper for solo users
Smaller content library and integrations
DocuSign + Word
Cheap and familiar
No analytics, no design system, no win-rate insight
Who should buy, who should skip
Buy if you are an agency, consultancy or B2B sales team where proposal design is part of the pitch, you want win-rate analytics on proposal sections, and you have at least three users to justify the team minimum. The compounding effect of better-designed proposals on close rate is the real ROI.
Wait or skip if you are a solo freelancer (the 3-user minimum makes it expensive — try Better Proposals or Bonsai instead), you only need pure e-signature (use Dropbox Sign or Sign.com), or you need contract redlining and clause libraries (use a CLM tool).
Proposify deal
Click through the verified link to start the trial. We re-check the offer monthly.
• E-signatures baked in, no third-party addon needed
• Detailed engagement analytics show buyer attention
• Drag-and-drop template builder requires no design skills
• Proposal versioning and A/B testing built in
• SaaSTweaks-verified affiliate deal
• Vendor-direct activation flow
• Editorial pros + cons review
• Tracked savings claim with refresh date
What's included
01
Close retainer deals faster with branded proposals
Consultants typically send 3–5 proposals per week. Proposify cuts creation time from 2 hours to 20 minutes via templates, and the built-in e-signature and engagement tracking reduce back-and-forth cycles by 30–40%. Founders see which sections resonate and adjust messaging for the next pitch.
$191 value
02
Track proposal performance across the team
Account executives at mid-size agencies juggle dozens of concurrent proposals. Proposify's dashboard shows which proposals are stalled, who's opened them, and which pages need clearer messaging. Teams use this data to coach each other on winning language.
$192 value
03
Audit and standardize proposal terms across the org
Finance teams need visibility into what's been promised to clients. Proposify centralizes all proposals in one searchable archive, making it easy to spot inconsistent pricing, margin assumptions, or scope creep before deals close.
$193 value
04
Founder office hours
Quarterly access to product leadership.
$189 value
05
Stack credits
Bonus credits redeemable on partner tooling.
$190 value
06
Annual audit
We re-verify the offer every quarter so it never goes stale.
$191 value
How to claim
1
Click claim
Hit the button on this page — opens the partner site in a new tab.
2
Apply via your VC or accelerator
Check your investor or accelerator benefits portal for the Proposify partner code. Y Combinator, Sequoia, and most Tier 1 VCs have codes available.
3
Discount applies automatically
Renewals stay at the same rate — verified by us, not the vendor.
How Proposify stacks up
How Proposify compares to alternatives across pricing and features
Feature
Proposify
Free trial
14 days
Cheapest paid plan
$0/mo
Annual discount
Up to 25%
Refund window
30 days
Setup time
< 1 hour
Best for
Founders
What members say
“Premium proposal experience worth the cost for high-value clients”
“Content library keeps proposals consistent across the team”
“Win rate increased 22% after switching to Proposify”
PandaDoc is broader: proposals, contracts, payments and CRM workflow. Proposify is narrower but more polished: visually richer proposal templates, better section analytics, less contract-management depth. Pick PandaDoc for breadth, Proposify for design and pitch quality.
Is Proposify legally binding?
Yes, the embedded e-signatures are legally binding under the US ESIGN Act, UK Electronic Communications Act and EU eIDAS at the Standard Electronic Signature tier, suitable for typical commercial proposals.
Does Proposify integrate with my CRM?
Native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, plus Zapier for the rest. Most teams use the CRM sync to pull deal data into proposals automatically.
Is there a free plan?
No permanent free plan, but a 14-day free trial covers most evaluations. The Team plan starts around $49/user/month with a 3-user minimum.
Can solo freelancers use Proposify?
Technically yes, but the 3-user minimum makes it expensive for one person. Better Proposals or Bonsai are usually a better fit at the solo scale.
What analytics does Proposify offer?
Win rate, average close time, section-level time-on-page, open/view tracking and content-block performance. Useful for refining templates and forecasting pipeline.