Comparison
Hotjar vs PostHog
The verdict
Hotjar wins for most buyers
Hotjar edges ahead with a SaaSTweaks Score of 78/100 vs PostHog's 73/100, so it's our default analytics pick for most teams. Hotjar offers a strong verified discount on annual plans, delivering excellent qualitative insights and good value, though it requ Where Hotjar leads is deal strength; PostHog, scoring 73/100, is the stronger choice when capability is your priority — PostHog offers exceptional capability and time-to-value with strong open-source flexibility, though its verified deal strength is Both are verified, real deals; the right pick comes down to which pillars below matter most for your team.
See Hotjar deal →
Or compare PostHog deals below.
Pick Hotjar if…
- ✓ Deal strength matters most to you: Hotjar scores 8.0/10 vs PostHog's 3.0/10. VERIFIED DEAL MECHANIC: percentage discount (Save 40% on annual plans). EDITORIAL SUMMARY confirms the discount brings Plus to $23
Pick PostHog if…
- ✓ Capability matters most to you: PostHog scores 10.0/10 vs Hotjar's 8.0/10. Editorial summary gives 'Feature breadth 10/10' and details 'eight tightly integrated tools in one SDK' including product analytic
- ✓ Time to value matters most to you: PostHog scores 9.0/10 vs Hotjar's 8.0/10. Editorial summary rates 'Setup 9/10' and notes 'One snippet, autocapture on, events flowing in under 5 minutes.' Field note NOTE-0
- ✓ Flexibility & exit matters most to you: PostHog scores 8.0/10 vs Hotjar's 5.0/10. Tool is open-source (MIT-ish license) with self-hosting supported, enabling full data control and portability. Editorial summary n
Feature comparison
| Feature | Hotjar | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| SaaSTweaks Score | 78/100 | 73/100 |
| Deal strength | 8.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Value for money | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Capability | 8.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Time to value | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Trust & reliability | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Flexibility & exit | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Pricing side-by-side
| Plan tier | Hotjar | PostHog | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Custom | Custom | |
| Free plan | No | Yes | |
| The deal | Save 40% on annual plans | Verified founder pricing |
Migration notes
Migrating between Hotjar and PostHog is straightforward for most teams — export your data (CSV/API) and import into the new tool. Check current export terms on each deal page.
FAQ
It depends on your priorities. Overall, Hotjar scores 78/100 versus PostHog's 73/100 on the SaaSTweaks benchmark, so Hotjar is our default pick. That said, PostHog is the better choice when capability matters more to you. Both are scored across the same six pillars below.
Hotjar starts at Custom and PostHog at Custom on their entry paid tiers. Factor in each verified deal too: Hotjar — Save 40% on annual plans; PostHog — Verified founder pricing. The cheaper option depends on your seat count and which plan you need.
On deal strength specifically, Hotjar scores 8.0/10 and PostHog scores 3.0/10. VERIFIED DEAL MECHANIC: percentage discount (Save 40% on annual plans). EDITORIAL SUMMARY confirms the discount brings Plus to $23 See each deal page for the live offer and terms.
Yes. Before migrating, check each tool's data export and onboarding — most analytics tools support CSV or API export. Hotjar scores 5.0/10 on flexibility & exit and PostHog 8.0/10, which is a good proxy for how painless switching will be.
Each tool earns a 0–100 SaaSTweaks Score weighted across six pillars: deal strength, value for money, capability, time to value, trust & reliability, and flexibility & exit. The ranking here is strictly by score — never by commission. See our methodology at /how-we-score.