Integromat
Dev Tools Verified May 2026
Make (formerly Integromat) is the visual workflow automation platform — build complex multi-step automations with branching logic, data transformation and error handling on a drag-and-drop canvas.
- Visual canvas shows the full automation flow at a glance — superior for complex scenarios
- Data transformation tools (array aggregators, iterators, text parsers) handle edge cases Zapier cannot
- Error handling and retry logic built into the workflow design
- 1-min polling on paid plans is faster than Zapier's 2-min minimum
How Integromat scored 57/100
6 weighted criteria, each scored out of 10 and published with its reasoning. Featured placements never move a score.
Deal Strength
3.0 /10There is no coupon or verified discount here, just Make's standard pricing plus a permanently free tier worth 1,000 operations a month. The free plan is genuinely useful for testing, but the link itself saves you nothing.
Value for Money
8.0 /10Core is $9/mo for 10,000 operations and Pro is $16/mo, meaningfully cheaper per operation than Zapier. Cost stays predictable as volume grows, which matters once automations fire thousands of times a month.
Capability
8.0 /10Routers, iterators, aggregators, error handlers, HTTP modules, AI Agents and Make Grid make it more capable than Zapier on complex flows. The app library is the slightly narrower side; workflow flexibility is where it wins.
Time to Value
5.0 /10Make is less beginner-friendly than its rivals, and the honest advice is to spend an afternoon learning the canvas before building anything important. The free tier lets you practise, so expect days before a production scenario runs.
Trust & Reliability
5.0 /10Make shows customer logos including Bamboo HR and BNY. It publishes no uptime SLA, support commitments or independent review counts, so you are relying on brand-name references rather than anything measurable.
Flexibility & Exit
5.0 /10The Free plan has no time limit and paid plans (Core, Pro, Teams) bill monthly, so nothing forces a year-long commitment. Make does not publish cancellation or export detail, so check how scenario definitions come out.
About Integromat
Quick answer
Make (formerly Integromat) is the visual workflow automation platform — build complex multi-step automations with branching logic, data transformation and error handling on a drag-and-drop canvas.
Integromat (now Make), in 30 seconds
Integromat became Make in 2022. The product is the same idea: a visual workflow builder where you connect apps with modules on a canvas, then route data through filters, routers, iterators and aggregators. It is more capable than Zapier on complex flows and meaningfully cheaper per operation, at the cost of a steeper learning curve.
How Make actually works
Each automation is a "scenario" — a graph of modules. A trigger module starts the run, downstream modules call APIs or transform data, and you pay per operation (one module run = one operation, more or less). Built-in tools include array iterators, aggregators, error handlers, sleep, and HTTP modules for any API without a native integration.
Recent additions worth knowing about: AI Agents for LLM-driven steps, Make Grid for orchestrating multiple scenarios, and tighter SSO and audit features for Enterprise. For a no-code tool, the depth here is unusual.
Pricing reality
Make has a free plan with 1,000 operations a month and two active scenarios — fine for personal automations. Paid plans are Core (around 9 dollars/month for 10,000 operations), Pro (around 16 dollars/month with custom variables and priority execution), Teams, and Enterprise. The big difference versus Zapier is that operations are cheap and granular: you can run hundreds of small scenarios without the bill exploding.
The catch: complex scenarios with iterators and routers consume more operations than they look like they should. Build a few real workflows on the trial before committing.
Make vs the alternatives
| Tool | Best for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Make | Complex multi-step flows, branching, data transforms | Steeper learning curve than Zapier |
| Zapier | Simple two- or three-step automations, biggest app library | Per-task pricing gets expensive at volume |
| n8n | Self-hosted, dev-friendly, fair-code licence | You operate it; smaller managed footprint |
| Pipedream | Code-first developers who want a hosted runtime | Less polished UI for non-technical users |
Buy if / skip if
Buy if you
- Build automations that branch, loop or aggregate data — Zapier struggles here.
- Want predictable cost per operation as workflow volume grows.
- Are happy spending an afternoon learning routers, iterators and error handlers.
- Need a serious HTTP module for APIs that don't have a native connector.
Skip if you
- Only need simple "when this, do that" two-step flows — Zapier will be quicker to set up.
- Want to self-host on your own infrastructure — n8n is a better fit.
- Have engineering capacity and prefer a code-first runtime — Pipedream or Inngest.
What's included
- Visual workflow builder requires zero code
- 1000+ pre-built app connectors
- Pay-per-operation pricing scales with usage
- Built-in error handling and retry logic
- SaaSTweaks-verified affiliate deal
- Vendor-direct activation flow
- Editorial pros + cons review
- Tracked savings claim with refresh date
Integromat pricing
Verified May 2026. Vendor's published rates at the time we checked — always confirm at checkout.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 ops/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-min polling, core apps |
| Core | $9/mo | 10,000 ops/mo, unlimited scenarios, 1-min intervals, all apps |
| Pro | $16/mo | 10,000 ops/mo, full execution log, custom variables, priority execution |
| Teams | $29/mo | Unlimited team members, shared scenarios, team permissions |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom ops, SSO, dedicated infrastructure, SLA, advanced security |
Getting started
4 steps. The last one is the part most people skip.
- 1
Open Integromat through the link on this page
It carries our referral tag. The price you pay is identical either way, and it never changes the score on this page.
- 2
Compare the tiers against what you actually use
The pricing table on this page lists what each plan includes. Match it to real usage rather than the tier the vendor highlights.
- 3
Start on the smallest plan that fits
Most vendors let you move up mid-cycle and bill the difference, so starting low costs you nothing but starting high does.
- 4
Check the renewal terms before you commit
Note the renewal date and the rate it reverts to, so the second invoice is not a surprise. Annual plans are usually cheaper per month but harder to exit.
Where Integromat wins and loses
What works
- Visual canvas shows the full automation flow at a glance — superior for complex scenarios
- Data transformation tools (array aggregators, iterators, text parsers) handle edge cases Zapier cannot
- Error handling and retry logic built into the workflow design
- 1-min polling on paid plans is faster than Zapier's 2-min minimum
What doesn't
- Operations count-based pricing means data-heavy workflows consume budget quickly
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier for non-technical users
- Rebranding from Integromat to Make created some legacy documentation confusion
The bottom line
Make offers strong value and capability for complex automations but has a steeper learning curve and no significant verified discount beyond its free tier.
Yes — Integromat was rebranded to Make in 2022 after being acquired by Celonis. The product, scenarios and pricing all carried across; the name and URL changed.
Make uses a visual graph and pays per operation rather than per task. It is more flexible for branching, looping and data transformation, and usually cheaper at volume. Zapier is faster to set up for simple flows and has a slightly larger app library.
1,000 operations per month and two active scenarios, with the full module library. It's genuinely useful for personal projects and proofs of concept.
Yes — the HTTP module supports arbitrary REST and SOAP calls with full control over headers, auth and body. For OAuth-protected APIs there's a dedicated OAuth module.
There are native modules for OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral and other LLM providers, plus the recently launched AI Agents for more autonomous flows. It's not as opinionated as a dedicated agent framework but works well for triggered automations.
Yes — Enterprise adds SSO, audit logs, custom data residency and a dedicated success manager, with custom pricing.
